Grant Board ok’s new contract with FHC
By Ken De Laat There seemed to be an air of cautious optimism among the 100 or so folks who attended the Grant School Board meeting. There was a buzz that an agreement had been reached to keep the Child and Adolescent Health Center at the school. After the usual proceedings with reports from school staff the board went into closed session to discuss the contract with Family Health Center. An hour or so later they came back into session and after some discussion the board approved the new contract with Family Health Care. Board members Rob Schutema and Stephanie Deible both expressed concern with some of the contract wording before casting their yes votes. There were a few items that included board involvement in meetings with the CAHC, clarification of various parental notices and some security issues surrounding an entrance to the clinic among others. And then there was the mural. All along it had been the contention of those who spoke during public comment that the mural, a painting by a young student containing images that certain board members objected to, was the primary cause of their desire to end the contract for the CAHC. Last year the mural became a national news item putting Grant on the map as having a school board opposing the depictions of gay and transgender images included in the artwork. Artwork that was created to promote more acceptance of the diversity of our youth. But in the end the contract delivered what the 4 members of the board who have been solidly allied in their opposition to the CAHC, as evidenced by their consistent votes in June and July to terminate the contract, seemingly wanted from the get-go. From their actions at those previous meetings Ken Thorne, Sabrina Veltkamp-Blok, Rachal Gort, and Richard Vance were evidently prepared to see the demise of the CAHC which would withdraw access to health care, dental care, and increasingly important mental health care to hundreds of Grant students in need. And now, while facing a recall petition drive, the four have allowed the clinic to stay. But the mural will be going. The contract involved minor changes but the wording that gives the board the power to make a decision on what art work and other decor can be in the Center and clearly points to the mural and its departure. During public comment the board was thanked for their decision but were also reminded…often reminded… that the recall effort would be moving forward. Here is the statement from Family Health Care regarding the decision. “We are happy that the Grant School Board has approved a contract that allows us to move forward and continue providing easy access to high-quality health care at the school-based clinic. The new contract does not change the way services are provided. The language follows all program requirements set forth by the Michigan Department of Health and Human Services. Stipulations of the contract include increased transparency, formalizing the Board of Education’s involvement with the Community Advisory Council; regular updates provided to the Board on operations of the school-based clinic; utilities for the clinic being billed to the health center or a third-party; and removal of the student-created mural in the lobby of the clinic. During contract negotiations, it was clear the mural was important to the Board of Education. The student painted the mural to highlight inclusivity and diversity, values that are important to Family Health Care. Diversity, equity, and inclusion are at the forefront of everything we do at Family Health Care. As required by law, we are accepting of all students regardless of age, race, color, national origin, disability, religion, or sex, including sexual orientation or gender identity. While it is disappointing that the mural must be removed by the end of October, it’s a compromise we reluctantly were willing to accept to ensure the children of the Grant community continue to have access to medical and behavioral health care.”
8 Comments
Randy Butters
9/12/2023 01:31:39 pm
See! It WAS about the mural all along.
Reply
Patty Steffes
9/12/2023 02:48:06 pm
Was it? Or was it all these people that push the LGBTQ+ ideology on the children, including the author of this article? There are so many puzzle pieces you and others are not seeing. Being inclusive is important and so is let children be children.
Reply
Angela Tyler
9/13/2023 07:14:47 am
Let children be children includes ALL children, even the ones you clearly don’t support. People like you make this mural necessary.
Randy Butters
9/13/2023 09:28:49 am
Well, yes, I think maybe you've put your finger on it. It's not so much the mural but the ideas that people are taking from it.
stardust
9/16/2023 10:55:42 am
No one is pushing an LGBTQ agenda on anyone. It's recognizing that there are lots of kids and adults that don't fit into traditional categories. Taking down the mural is a step backward. 9/17/2023 10:01:56 pm
That's all it ever was, the mural ! Seems a lot of hypocrites live in Grant. Thought the young lady did an excellent job and so sorry to see it painted over.
Reply
Jonathan Riedel
9/12/2023 01:36:46 pm
Will there be any efforts to preserve and relocate the mural?
Reply
Jenn Derwin
9/17/2023 09:30:55 pm
This is sickening. Adults not being able to handle art made by a child. As if LGBTQ+ kids already did not feel welcome in this community, now you are literally erasing them. Nice job.
Reply
Your comment will be posted after it is approved.
Leave a Reply. |
CategoriesArchives
March 2025
|